Who Is Speaking at [un]prompted II: Every Session by Speaker, Company and Subject
By Renn Calloway · October 13, 2026
Category: ai-security-conferences
Every speaker on the [un]prompted II agenda, sorted by surname, with company, talk and stage, then grouped by concern and by employer. Read from the official agenda on 2026-10-12.
Key takeaways
The problem The agenda read on 2026-10-12 lists 85 sessions on two stages across October 27-29, 2026, naming 106 distinct speakers.
Core insight Gadi Evron of Knostic is host and CFP Chair, and he opens and closes all three days on Stage 1. Three slots are TBD or TBA and two titled sessions list no speaker, so the line-up is not final. Microsoft, Google, Meta and Dropbox each supply several speakers, and many other organisations supply one or two.
Practical outcome This page is independent coverage and does not state what any speaker said, because the event has not happened.
[un]prompted II, the AI Security Practitioner Conference that many people search for as "unprompted", runs October 27-29, 2026 in San Francisco. The agenda lists 85 sessions on two stages over three days, and the line-up is the argument: who the programme invites says what the field now thinks is worth a stage. Our [un]prompted II conference guide covers the whole event. This page answers one question: who is speaking.
The names below come from the official agenda, which we read on 2026-10-12. An agenda can change, and this one still has open slots. We are independent coverage. We are not the organiser, a sponsor or a media partner, and we are following the event remotely. The conference has not happened, so this page never states what a speaker said. It reports what each published abstract claims, and what we plan to test.
The unprompted speakers, A to Z
This table lists every named speaker on the agenda as published on 2026-10-12, sorted by surname. A speaker with two talks has two rows. A blank company cell means the agenda lists none. We did not fill gaps by guessing. Gadi Evron, who is the host, opens and closes all three days on Stage 1.
| Speaker | Company | Talk | Day and stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ankit Agrawal | Webflow | Sandboxing Agents is a Three-Body Problem: Containment, Provenance, and the Human Authority | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Ali Arshad | Consortium Networks | Your AI Analyst Is Confidently Wrong: Adversarial QC for Agentic Security Analysis | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Aishwarya Athreya | Visa | Beyond the SBOM: Proving Process Integrity with the Open PBOM Specification | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Ela Avrahami | From Patch Generation to Evidence: Building Trust in AI-Generated Code | Day 3, Stage 2 | |
| Zvika Babo | Radware | Who Is Prompt-Injecting Coding Agents? A Scan of 86 Million GitHub Items | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Oleksii Baranovskyi | Cracken | Who Authorized the Agent? Making the AI Harness an Enforceable Compliance Boundary | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Zion Basque | University of Georgia | Kuna: Building a Competitive C Decompiler Through Autonomous AI Research | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Gabe Bello | Twilio | Building Security Review Agents: the Models are the Reliable Part | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Rodrigo Branco | Anthropic | Agent Authorization Is Not a Vault Problem | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Jonathan Brossard | PSIRT.COM | Attacking Truth: Breaking Proof Assistant Kernels in the Age of Vericoding | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Fatih Bulut | Microsoft | The Autonomous Adversarial Loop: Fully Automating an Octo Tempest Purple-Team Simulation | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Elie Bursztein | Google DeepMind | Taming AI Agents with Capsem: Hardware Sandboxing That Doesn't Kill Productivity | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| John Cartwright | Auto-Exploiter by Use of a Ratchet Loop, Code Understanding, and… Haiku | Day 2, Stage 1 | |
| Rushikesh Chandak | Qulays | Confining Cross-Site Prompt Injection in Web Agents | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Viren Chaudhari | Qulays | Confining Cross-Site Prompt Injection in Web Agents | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Sahana Chennabasappa | Meta | Permission Fatigue Is a Security Bug: Dynamic Guardrails for Coding Agents | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| David Chismon | UK National Cyber Security Centre | What Designing a Cyber Ontology for Agents Taught Us About Governance | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Vincenzo Ciancaglini | OH MODEL, WHERE ART THOU: Hacking Chrome's Local SLM | Day 2, Stage 2 | |
| Noam Cohen | Torq | When Humans Can't Make It Hard Enough: Self-Hardening Environments for Frontier AI Investigators | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Daniel Cuthbert | Your Sandbox Degrades Gracefully, What's the Wurst That Could Happen? | Day 1, Stage 1 | |
| Bruce Dang | Calif.io | 0-Click Remote Exploits in an AI World | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Ads Dawson | Dreadnode | StealthBench: Can Autonomous Security Agents Do OPSEC Like An Experienced Operator? | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Tim de Waal | OpenAI | Prompt, Patch, Prove | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Amol Deshpande | Stripe | There Isn't a Security Problem an Agent Can't Help Solve | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Brendan Dolan-Gavitt | XBOW | A Tale of Two Chains | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Rik Dolfing | Pandora's Dir: Hope at the bottom of ../ | Day 2, Stage 2 | |
| Joao Donato | Promptware EOD: Skillful Agent Detonation | Day 1, Stage 2 | |
| Kevin Donovan | CISA | CISA's Experience and Lessons Learned in AI-Enabled Vulnerability Management | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Dan Dye | Google Cloud Security | Engineering Context for SOC Agents: Lessons, Failures, and Open Questions | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Alec Eckmann | "WTF Was That?" Dispatches From the Wrong End of an Agent Swarm | Day 1, Stage 1 | |
| Guy Elad | Reading the Residual Stream: Productizing Activation-Probe Security at Intuit | Day 3, Stage 2 | |
| Sergej Epp | Debate: Where is the vulnpocalypse? | Day 1, Stage 1 | |
| Sergej Epp | Say Shibboleth: Fingerprinting the Models Behind Agentic Attacks | Day 1, Stage 2 | |
| Reef Ettedgui | Pandora's Dir: Hope at the bottom of ../ | Day 2, Stage 2 | |
| Gadi Evron | Knostic | Auto-Exploiter by Use of a Ratchet Loop, Code Understanding, and… Haiku | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Gadi Evron | Knostic | Opening Words and Closing Remarks (hosts all three days) | Days 1-3, Stage 1 |
| Damian Finol | Felix Pago | Enterprise OpenClaw: Tackling Agentic Security at Scale | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Alexander Frazer | Runlayer | AI Client Builders are Not Security Companies (And Shouldn't Have To Be) | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Evelina Gabasova | Aisle Inc | Hidden Triggers, Harmful Payloads: Auditing Trojan Open-Weight LLMs | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Nick Galloway | Google Cloud | Secure Product Development With Mantis | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Daniel Geyshis | Knostic | BITE – Behavior-Intent Traceable Evaluation | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Nicole Grinstead | Roblox | Everyone Wants All the AI Tools. Good. | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Jeremiah Grossman | Root Evidence | Debate: Where is the vulnpocalypse? | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Anna Groza | Calif.io | 0-Click Remote Exploits in an AI World | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Erez Harush | Wiz/Google | Same Threat, Two Verdicts: Shadow Testing Our SOC Agent | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Tobias Heldt | XOR | Models vs Cyber Reality: Frontier Agents Against Our Own Privately Disclosed Zero-Days | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Ari Herbert-Voss | RunSybil | What Building Early Foundation Models Teaches Us About AI Safety Hype vs. Reality | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Alvaro Inckot | AI Client Builders are Not Security Companies (And Shouldn't Have To Be) | Day 2, Stage 2 | |
| Sannan Iqbal | Oscar Health | Twelve Consoles, One Investigation | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Tamir Isaschar | Knostic | BITE – Behavior-Intent Traceable Evaluation | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Jasmine Jaksic | NVIDIA | Agentic AI in the Wild: What Real Deployments Teach Us About Governance and Scale | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Sunghyeon Jo | QED Audit; Georgia Institute of Technology | Cryptography Under AI Pressure | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Farzan Karimi | Moderna | Threat Model Impossible: 1 Agent. 30 Days. 687 Security Reviews. And a Refrigerator. | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Jason Keirstead | AgencyScore and AgencyGym: Measuring Excessive Agency Before Deployment | Day 2, Stage 2 | |
| Taesoo Kim | Microsoft | From DARPA AIxCC to Microsoft FORGE Lab: Lessons Building Hyperscale AI Code Scanning Tools | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Maxim Kovalsky | Consortium Networks | Your AI Analyst Is Confidently Wrong: Adversarial QC for Agentic Security Analysis | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Igor Kozlov | Simibian.ai | Offense != Defense: LLM Cyber Defense – Hunt, Bust, Climb | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Rock Lambros | Zenity | All Tokens Are Created Equal, Including the Attacker's | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Kamile Lukosiute | OpenAI Foundation | Building the Defender's Advantage: Technical Solutions for AI Cyber Resilience | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Patrik Mada | Aisle Inc | Hidden Triggers, Harmful Payloads: Auditing Trojan Open-Weight LLMs | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Anjali Mangal | The Autonomous Adversarial Loop: Fully Automating an Octo Tempest Purple-Team Simulation | Day 1, Stage 2 | |
| Brooks McMillin | Dropbox | Approval Is Not Human Presence: Building and Breaking an MCP Permission Broker | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Jagannadh Mellacheruvu | Columbia University | Auditing Someone Else's Confidential AI | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Leo Meyerovich | Graphistry | Three Years of Evals Later: What's Changing in Model and Harness IR/SOC Scores | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Ariana Mirian | BeeSafe AI | Victim as a Service: Defending Against Trust Based Scams using AI | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| David Molnar | Meta | How Meta Changed Building Secure Software With AI | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Xenia Mountrouidou | AppGate | We don't need an LLM for That | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Akash Mukherjee | Realm Labs | Attention Is All You Need (to Catch Hallucinations & Prompt Injections) | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Shahanas Najeeb | Salesforce | Metrics for Agentic Systems: What "Good" Looks Like for a Security Agent | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Gabi Nakibly | Radware | Who Is Prompt-Injecting Coding Agents? A Scan of 86 Million GitHub Items | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Shayaun Nejad | Rubrik | Opened Is Not Fixed: The Last Mile of AI Vulnerability Remediation | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Ajaya Neupane | Ent AI | Half the Model Never Multiplies: Quantizing a Reasoner for the Endpoint | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Omer Nevo | Irregular | When Evaluation Runs Start Talking to Each Other | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Vince Ovando | The Model Is NOT a Security Control: Prompt Injection Dies at the Token Sampler | Day 1, Stage 2 | |
| Dario Pasquini | Cracken | Say Shibboleth: Fingerprinting the Models Behind Agentic Attacks | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Chris Puderbaugh | Meta | Permission Fatigue Is a Security Bug: Dynamic Guardrails for Coding Agents | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Venkat Raghavan | LangGuard.AI | AgencyScore and AgencyGym: Measuring Excessive Agency Before Deployment | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Jackson Reed | –Dangerously-Deploy-Sandboxes: a Story of Isolation and Alignment | Day 3, Stage 1 | |
| Yolan Romailler | Confidential AI | AI Inference and its Privacy and Confidentiality challenges | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Olivia Rose | Williams Rose AI Cyber Advisory | Built to Spec, Ignored in Practice: Rebuilding AI Intake People Actually Use | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Markku-Juhani O. Saarinen | Math Ability has Consequences: AI Cryptanalysis | Day 2, Stage 2 | |
| Bruce Schneier | Harvard Kennedy School; University of Toronto | Integrous AI Systems Design | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Tim Schulz | Starseer | Same Score, Different Brain: Comparing Models by How They Process What They Know | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Eyal Sela | Gambit Security | The death of TTPs – Fully Autonomous Cyber Attacks in the Wild | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Giorgio Severi | Microsoft | But the Reasoning Looks Right! Backdoors That Evade CoT Monitoring | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Giorgio Severi | Microsoft | Memory Is the New Attack Surface: Benchmarking Poisoning Through Agent Memory | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Ruchi Shah | Google Cloud | Secure Product Development With Mantis | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Tamir Ishay Sharbat | Zenity | Promptware EOD: Skillful Agent Detonation | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Roei Sherman | Two Sparks Walk Into a Lab | Day 2, Stage 2 | |
| Saurabh Shintre | Realm Labs | Attention Is All You Need (to Catch Hallucinations & Prompt Injections) | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Guy Shtar | Intuit | Reading the Residual Stream: Productizing Activation-Probe Security at Intuit | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Caleb Sima | "WTF Was That?" Dispatches From the Wrong End of an Agent Swarm | Day 1, Stage 1 | |
| Petr Simecek | AISLE | The Scanner Said Clean. We Ran It Again: Stochastic False Negatives in LLM Vulnerability Detection | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Matt Suiche | Tolmo | Weightless: Abliteration Without the Weights | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Mike Takahashi | Zenity | Into the Wild: Hunting Real-World Attacks on AI Systems | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Kat Traxler | Vectra AI | Your Harness Needs a Security Constitution | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| David Tulis | TrendAI | OH MODEL, WHERE ART THOU: Hacking Chrome's Local SLM | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Kavia Venkatesh | Cigna | Beyond the SBOM: Proving Process Integrity with the Open PBOM Specification | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Tal Waitzenberg | Wiz/Google | Same Threat, Two Verdicts: Shadow Testing Our SOC Agent | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Chenxi Wang | Rain Capital | Agentic AI in the Wild: What Real Deployments Teach Us About Governance and Scale | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| Kayla Williams | Williams Rose AI Cyber Advisory | Built to Spec, Ignored in Practice: Rebuilding AI Intake People Actually Use | Day 2, Stage 2 |
| Fred Wilmot | Detecteam | All Tokens Are Created Equal, Including the Attacker's | Day 1, Stage 2 |
| Casey Wilson | BusinessLoans.com | We don't need an LLM for That | Day 3, Stage 2 |
| Adrian Wood | Dropbox | StealthBench: Can Autonomous Security Agents Do OPSEC Like An Experienced Operator? | Day 1, Stage 1 |
| Adrian Wood | Dropbox | Every Dog Has its 0-day | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Josh Woodruff | MassiveScale.AI | What 40 Enterprises Who Asked for Agent Governance Had, and the Control Plane That Came Out of It | Day 3, Stage 1 |
| David Yang | RPI; Microsoft | Memory Is the New Attack Surface: Benchmarking Poisoning Through Agent Memory | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Yernat Yestekov | Anthropic | Claude Can Capture the Flag. Can It Hold the Fort? | Day 2, Stage 1 |
| Sounil Yu | Giving AI Religion | Day 3, Stage 1 | |
| Felipe Zimmerle | KonaSense | Agent Authorization Is Not a Vault Problem | Day 3, Stage 1 |
The table holds 106 distinct names across 110 rows. Three slots have no speaker and no real title: Day 2 Stage 1 at 13:30 ("TBD"), and Day 3 Stage 2 at 11:10 and 11:35 ("TBA"). Two more have a title and no speaker: "Stolen Thoughts: How Adversaries Steal Reasoning for Industrial-Scale Distillation" and "CISOs debrief: What we learned, what we need", both Day 2 Stage 1. Those five do not appear in the table because they have no names to sort.
Who to follow if you care about...
The A-to-Z order hides the themes. These six groups follow the concerns of this blog. We group by the abstract, not by the speaker's reputation, and each clause says what the abstract says it covers.
Prompt injection and context integrity
- Rock Lambros (Zenity) and Fred Wilmot (Detecteam): the abstract uses the EchoLeak exploit to argue models do not separate trusted tokens from untrusted ones, and releases CxBOM.
- Gabi Nakibly and Zvika Babo (Radware): a scan of 86 million GitHub items for hidden-text injection aimed at coding agents.
- Viren Chaudhari and Rushikesh Chandak (Qulays): cross-site prompting against browsing agents, and a least-privilege defense called Tenacity.
- Vince Ovando: a 6.1 million call injection arena, and a title that says the model is not a security control.
- Saurabh Shintre and Akash Mukherjee (Realm Labs): detection from hidden states, with no extra LLM calls.
- Bruce Schneier: integrity as the property AI-driven systems most need.
Background: prompt injection in multi-agent pipelines.
Agent sandboxing and containment
- Elie Bursztein (Google DeepMind): Capsem, an open-source Rust hypervisor for hardened agent environments.
- Daniel Cuthbert: the sandbox built for RAPTOR, and the security issues the team introduced themselves.
- Ankit Agrawal (Webflow): sandboxing framed as containment, provenance and authority together.
- Tamir Ishay Sharbat (Zenity) and Joao Donato: a detonation chamber for agent skills.
- Jackson Reed: isolation weaknesses in a deployed frontier-lab product, with details pending coordinated disclosure.
- Damian Finol (Felix Pago): gVisor sandboxing inside an identity-aware agent runtime.
Background: sandboxing AI agent tool calls.
Identity, authorization and approval
- Oleksii Baranovskyi (Cracken): a harness that enforces policy, with a demo of a decision-only API against an inline proxy.
- Felipe Zimmerle (KonaSense) and Rodrigo Branco (Anthropic): approvals that bind to the exact bytes signed, not to an agent-written summary.
- Brooks McMillin (Dropbox): an MCP permission broker that asks for evidence of human presence.
- Sahana Chennabasappa and Chris Puderbaugh (Meta): permission fatigue, and taint-tracking guardrails.
- Sounil Yu: least agency as a complement to least privilege.
Background: why least privilege is harder with agents.
Autonomous offense and vulnerability discovery
- Brendan Dolan-Gavitt (XBOW): two Chrome full-chain exploits, one mostly human, one built with AI agents.
- Tobias Heldt (XOR): frontier agents against the company's own zero-days, with counts of exploits and accepted patches.
- Taesoo Kim (Microsoft): from the AIxCC win to production vulnerability discovery.
- Eyal Sela (Gambit Security): an autonomous criminal campaign using an open-weight model.
- Fatih Bulut (Microsoft) and Anjali Mangal: a fully automated purple-team loop.
- Bruce Dang and Anna Groza (Calif.io): LLM-driven audit of messaging-app attack surface.
Background: AI-discovered vulnerabilities.
Evaluation and benchmarks
- Adrian Wood (Dropbox) and Ads Dawson (Dreadnode): StealthBench scores OPSEC as well as task success.
- Leo Meyerovich (Graphistry): three years of IR and SOC evals, and an argument to own your evals.
- Omer Nevo (Irregular): evaluation runs that find each other through shared infrastructure.
- Tim Schulz (Starseer): same benchmark score, different internal processing.
- Petr Simecek (AISLE): 25,000 trials on stochastic false negatives in LLM scanners.
- Shahanas Najeeb (Salesforce): metrics for production security agents beyond accuracy.
Governance and policy
- Josh Woodruff (MassiveScale.AI): governance as code, drawn from 40 enterprises.
- Chenxi Wang (Rain Capital) and Jasmine Jaksic (NVIDIA): research across 28 organisations.
- David Chismon (UK National Cyber Security Centre): a cyber ontology and what it shows about governance.
- Kamile Lukosiute (OpenAI Foundation): defender opportunities, including an AI cybersecurity observatory.
- Nicole Grinstead (Roblox): governing AI tool adoption without blanket refusal.
- Kevin Donovan (CISA): AI in vulnerability management at CVE and KEV scale.
Background: human oversight in production.
The organisations on the unprompted stages
This table groups speakers by the employer the agenda lists. The last column is our reading, not a claim from the organisations. Spelling follows the agenda, which writes "AISLE" for one talk and "Aisle Inc" for another.
| Organisation | Speakers | What the presence signals |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Taesoo Kim, Giorgio Severi, Fatih Bulut, David Yang (also RPI) | Offense automation, model backdoors and memory poisoning from one employer. |
| Google, Google Cloud, Google DeepMind, Wiz/Google | Elie Bursztein, Nick Galloway, Ruchi Shah, Dan Dye, Tal Waitzenberg, Erez Harush | Sandboxing, secure development and SOC agents. The agenda lists Wiz/Google, so we group them together. |
| Meta | David Molnar, Sahana Chennabasappa, Chris Puderbaugh | Two measured deployments: AI-fixed vulnerabilities and agent guardrails. |
| Dropbox | Adrian Wood, Brooks McMillin | Red team and permission control from one company. |
| Zenity | Rock Lambros, Mike Takahashi, Tamir Ishay Sharbat | Three talks on context attacks, honeypot data and malicious skills. |
| Knostic | Gadi Evron, Daniel Geyshis, Tamir Isaschar | The host's company also presents agent-artifact scanning. |
| Anthropic | Yernat Yestekov, Rodrigo Branco | A model lab speaking on defense and on approval design. |
| OpenAI and OpenAI Foundation | Tim de Waal, Kamile Lukosiute | One firmware-repair talk, one policy and resilience talk. |
| Wiz | Tal Waitzenberg, Erez Harush | Listed as Wiz/Google. One talk on testing a SOC agent for nondeterminism. |
| CISA | Kevin Donovan | A government vulnerability programme describing its own AI adoption. |
| UK National Cyber Security Centre | David Chismon | Governance work tied to the UK's CyberShield plan, per the abstract. |
| Radware | Gabi Nakibly, Zvika Babo | Large-scale measurement of injection in the wild. |
| Realm Labs | Saurabh Shintre, Akash Mukherjee | Detection based on model internals. |
| Qulays | Viren Chaudhari, Rushikesh Chandak | Web-agent confinement. |
| Cracken | Oleksii Baranovskyi, Dario Pasquini | Policy enforcement and model fingerprinting. |
| Stripe, Salesforce, NVIDIA, Roblox, Moderna | Amol Deshpande, Shahanas Najeeb, Jasmine Jaksic, Nicole Grinstead, Farzan Karimi | Enterprise operators describing agents in production use. |
| Visa, Cigna, Twilio, Intuit, Oscar Health, Rubrik | Aishwarya Athreya, Kavia Venkatesh, Gabe Bello, Guy Shtar, Sannan Iqbal, Shayaun Nejad | Regulated and large-scale firms on supply chain, review agents and remediation. |
| AISLE and Aisle Inc | Petr Simecek, Patrik Mada, Evelina Gabasova | Scanner reliability and Trojan model auditing. We assume one company; the agenda spells it two ways. |
| XBOW, XOR, RunSybil, Calif.io | Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, Tobias Heldt, Ari Herbert-Voss, Bruce Dang, Anna Groza | Offensive-security companies reporting on AI-driven exploitation. |
| Vectra AI, Starseer, Tolmo, Torq, Irregular | Kat Traxler, Tim Schulz, Matt Suiche, Noam Cohen, Omer Nevo | Vendors and labs working on model behaviour, internals and evaluation. |
| Others | Webflow, Graphistry, Dreadnode, Detecteam, Root Evidence, Simibian.ai, Felix Pago, Gambit Security, and more | Small and mid-size firms carry much of the programme. |
| Universities | Columbia University, University of Georgia, Harvard Kennedy School, University of Toronto, RPI, Georgia Institute of Technology | Cryptanalysis, decompilation, privacy and AI policy. |
| No affiliation listed | Caleb Sima, Alec Eckmann, Daniel Cuthbert, Sergej Epp, Joao Donato, Vince Ovando, Anjali Mangal, John Cartwright, Roei Sherman, Vincenzo Ciancaglini, Rik Dolfing, Reef Ettedgui, Alvaro Inckot, Jason Keirstead, Markku-Juhani O. Saarinen, Jackson Reed, Sounil Yu, Guy Elad, Ela Avrahami | Independent researchers, or a gap in the agenda. We cannot tell which, so we write the name alone. |
The signals column is our interpretation of a published list. It says nothing about what any organisation will present beyond its abstract.
Who is missing
We have no ticketing or attendance data, so we cannot say who is attending, only who is speaking. Three slots are open ("TBD" on Day 2 Stage 1, "TBA" twice on Day 3 Stage 2), and two titled sessions list no speaker. The agenda may add names before October 27, and it may drop some. If you notice a gap that matters to you, check the official agenda again before you plan your days. We will update this page when the list changes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who runs [un]prompted II?
The agenda names Gadi Evron, CEO of Knostic, as host and CFP Chair. He opens and closes all three days on Stage 1. The agenda as we read it does not say which legal entity organises the event. We are independent coverage and have no role in it.
How many speakers are on the [un]prompted II agenda?
As published on 2026-10-12, the agenda names 106 distinct people across 85 sessions on Stage 1 and Stage 2. The count excludes five slots with no speaker listed, and it will change if the organisers add or remove sessions.
Can I see the speaker list myself?
Yes. The official agenda is at https://unpromptedcon.org/agenda-10-2026/. Our table is a sorted copy of it, read on 2026-10-12. If the two differ, the official page is right.
Are the unprompted talks recorded?
The agenda we read describes a hybrid event, in person and online. It does not state a recording policy, so we make no claim. Check the official site for the current terms.
Which talks have no speaker listed yet?
Day 2 Stage 1 at 13:30 is marked TBD. Day 3 Stage 2 at 11:10 and 11:35 are marked TBA. Day 2 Stage 1 also shows 'Stolen Thoughts' and 'CISOs debrief' with no named speaker.